Skip to main content

Major Step Forward in Global AI Governance - Scott Timcke

In a major development for global artificial intelligence (AI) governance, the UN-based Office for Digital and Emerging Technologies (ODET) has prepared a Zero Draft Resolution on the terms of reference for establishing an Independent International Scientific Panel on Artificial Intelligence and a Global Dialogue on Artificial Intelligence Governance.

After a round of consultation, the draft will be handed over to the UN General Assembly to action a motion.


Independent International Scientific Panel on AI

The Independent International Scientific Panel on Artificial Intelligence will provide multidisciplinary, evidence-based scientific assessments of AI’s opportunities, risks, capabilities, and impacts. The panel will consist of:

  • An Expert Committee of 20 members appointed by the UN Secretary-General.

  • An Advisory Committee of 40 members elected by the General Assembly.

Both committees will feature experts serving in their personal capacity, with appointments lasting three years (renewable once). The UN has emphasized the importance of geographical and gender balance in the selection process, along with diverse multidisciplinary representation.


Global Dialogue on AI Governance

Complementing the scientific panel, the UN has also established the Global Dialogue on Artificial Intelligence Governance. This platform will:

  • Facilitate open discussions on AI governance

  • Promote international cooperation and sharing of best practices

  • Identify ways AI can contribute to the Sustainable Development Goals

  • Support linguistic and cultural diversity

  • Foster interoperability between AI systems.

The first Dialogue is scheduled for September 2025 in New York. A second meeting is planned for Geneva in 2026.


What’s Next?

These initiatives represent a coordinated global response to the rapid advancement of AI technologies. By bringing together scientific expertise and multi-stakeholder dialogue, the UN aims to develop more coherent international approaches to AI governance. 

The framework includes provisions for regular assessment and review, with the first evaluation scheduled during the High-Level Review of the Global Digital Compact at the UN General Assembly’s 82nd session.


Some background on OEDT:  The UN Office for Digital and Emerging Technologies (ODET) transitioned to a permanent structure on 1 January 2025. This flowed from a decision by the UN General Assembly on 24 December 2024, following the adoption of the Global Digital Compact at the Summit of the Future in September 2024. 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Beyond a buzzword: Can Ubuntu reframe AI Ethics? - Anye Nyamnjoh

The turn to Ubuntu in AI ethics scholarship marks a critically important shift toward engaging African moral and politico-philosophical traditions in shaping technological futures. Often encapsulated through the phrase “a person is a person through other persons”, Ubuntu is frequently invoked to highlight ontological interdependency, communal responsibility, relational personhood, and the moral primacy of solidarity and care. It is often positioned as an alternative to individualism, with the potential to complement or “correct” Western liberal frameworks. But what does this invocation actually do? Is Ubuntu being used to transform how we think about ethical challenges in AI, or is the emerging discourse merely softening existing paradigms with a warmer cultural tone?   The emerging pattern A recurring pattern across the literature reveals a limited mode of Ubuntu engagement. It begins with a description of AI-related ethical concerns: dependency, bias, privacy, data coloni...
Post a Comment
Read more

AI Worker Cooperatives and a Strategy for Tackling Safe Havens - Nelson Otieno Okeyo

Artificial intelligence is transforming society, particularly work environments, with the rise of click work complicating labour rights. AI companies contract third-party firms in Kenya to train datasets, aiming to reduce bias and toxicity in AI models, under the guise of creating ethical AI . Despite AI systems being computer-based, they fundamentally rely on human labour for training datasets and for algorithm development. These workers could be content moderators or data labellers. A TIME investigation revealed concerns of working conditions for AI labourers , including low wages, toxic environments causing mental health issues, insufficient compensation, and stressful working conditions. Kenya's status as a regional ICT hub has made it a centre for this work, including dirty work, with several workers recently sharing their challenges in interviews with 60 Minutes Australia. Platform cooperatives' response: Opportunities and gaps  In Kenya, individuals and organizations ha...
Post a Comment
Read more