Skip to main content

Major Step Forward in Global AI Governance - Scott Timcke

In a major development for global artificial intelligence (AI) governance, the UN-based Office for Digital and Emerging Technologies (ODET) has prepared a Zero Draft Resolution on the terms of reference for establishing an Independent International Scientific Panel on Artificial Intelligence and a Global Dialogue on Artificial Intelligence Governance.

After a round of consultation, the draft will be handed over to the UN General Assembly to action a motion.


Independent International Scientific Panel on AI

The Independent International Scientific Panel on Artificial Intelligence will provide multidisciplinary, evidence-based scientific assessments of AI’s opportunities, risks, capabilities, and impacts. The panel will consist of:

  • An Expert Committee of 20 members appointed by the UN Secretary-General.

  • An Advisory Committee of 40 members elected by the General Assembly.

Both committees will feature experts serving in their personal capacity, with appointments lasting three years (renewable once). The UN has emphasized the importance of geographical and gender balance in the selection process, along with diverse multidisciplinary representation.


Global Dialogue on AI Governance

Complementing the scientific panel, the UN has also established the Global Dialogue on Artificial Intelligence Governance. This platform will:

  • Facilitate open discussions on AI governance

  • Promote international cooperation and sharing of best practices

  • Identify ways AI can contribute to the Sustainable Development Goals

  • Support linguistic and cultural diversity

  • Foster interoperability between AI systems.

The first Dialogue is scheduled for September 2025 in New York. A second meeting is planned for Geneva in 2026.


What’s Next?

These initiatives represent a coordinated global response to the rapid advancement of AI technologies. By bringing together scientific expertise and multi-stakeholder dialogue, the UN aims to develop more coherent international approaches to AI governance. 

The framework includes provisions for regular assessment and review, with the first evaluation scheduled during the High-Level Review of the Global Digital Compact at the UN General Assembly’s 82nd session.


Some background on OEDT:  The UN Office for Digital and Emerging Technologies (ODET) transitioned to a permanent structure on 1 January 2025. This flowed from a decision by the UN General Assembly on 24 December 2024, following the adoption of the Global Digital Compact at the Summit of the Future in September 2024. 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Beyond a buzzword: Can Ubuntu reframe AI Ethics? - Anye Nyamnjoh

The turn to Ubuntu in AI ethics scholarship marks a critically important shift toward engaging African moral and politico-philosophical traditions in shaping technological futures. Often encapsulated through the phrase “a person is a person through other persons”, Ubuntu is frequently invoked to highlight ontological interdependency, communal responsibility, relational personhood, and the moral primacy of solidarity and care. It is often positioned as an alternative to individualism, with the potential to complement or “correct” Western liberal frameworks. But what does this invocation actually do? Is Ubuntu being used to transform how we think about ethical challenges in AI, or is the emerging discourse merely softening existing paradigms with a warmer cultural tone?   The emerging pattern A recurring pattern across the literature reveals a limited mode of Ubuntu engagement. It begins with a description of AI-related ethical concerns: dependency, bias, privacy, data coloni...
Post a Comment
Read more

After AI in Africa: Some pertinent questions - Andrew Rens

Whether one views AI as a bubble or a boom, it must eventually end. If it is a bubble, AI may be sustained as improbably long as cryptocurrency, but it will inevitably subside. However, if AI is a burgeoning general technology, it will eventually become embedded in various other products and services. At that point, AI will no longer draw the same levels of investment and public scrutiny that it currently does. One question remains invisible in the formulation of AI policy across the African  continent: What will the legacy of AI be, and specifically, what infrastructure will remain after AI?  The shaping of AI's contribution to the future, through policy, implementation, and investment—whether aligned with national processes or not—seems curiously elided in the current AI debate. Lessons from South Africa's Minerals Revolution   In contemplating the end of AI in Africa, it is useful to reflect on the minerals revolution in Southern Africa that began in the 1860s and resh...
Post a Comment
Read more