Skip to main content

Major Step Forward in Global AI Governance - Scott Timcke

In a major development for global artificial intelligence (AI) governance, the UN-based Office for Digital and Emerging Technologies (ODET) has prepared a Zero Draft Resolution on the terms of reference for establishing an Independent International Scientific Panel on Artificial Intelligence and a Global Dialogue on Artificial Intelligence Governance.

After a round of consultation, the draft will be handed over to the UN General Assembly to action a motion.


Independent International Scientific Panel on AI

The Independent International Scientific Panel on Artificial Intelligence will provide multidisciplinary, evidence-based scientific assessments of AI’s opportunities, risks, capabilities, and impacts. The panel will consist of:

  • An Expert Committee of 20 members appointed by the UN Secretary-General.

  • An Advisory Committee of 40 members elected by the General Assembly.

Both committees will feature experts serving in their personal capacity, with appointments lasting three years (renewable once). The UN has emphasized the importance of geographical and gender balance in the selection process, along with diverse multidisciplinary representation.


Global Dialogue on AI Governance

Complementing the scientific panel, the UN has also established the Global Dialogue on Artificial Intelligence Governance. This platform will:

  • Facilitate open discussions on AI governance

  • Promote international cooperation and sharing of best practices

  • Identify ways AI can contribute to the Sustainable Development Goals

  • Support linguistic and cultural diversity

  • Foster interoperability between AI systems.

The first Dialogue is scheduled for September 2025 in New York. A second meeting is planned for Geneva in 2026.


What’s Next?

These initiatives represent a coordinated global response to the rapid advancement of AI technologies. By bringing together scientific expertise and multi-stakeholder dialogue, the UN aims to develop more coherent international approaches to AI governance. 

The framework includes provisions for regular assessment and review, with the first evaluation scheduled during the High-Level Review of the Global Digital Compact at the UN General Assembly’s 82nd session.


Some background on OEDT:  The UN Office for Digital and Emerging Technologies (ODET) transitioned to a permanent structure on 1 January 2025. This flowed from a decision by the UN General Assembly on 24 December 2024, following the adoption of the Global Digital Compact at the Summit of the Future in September 2024. 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Beyond a buzzword: Can Ubuntu reframe AI Ethics? - Anye Nyamnjoh

The turn to Ubuntu in AI ethics scholarship marks a critically important shift toward engaging African moral and politico-philosophical traditions in shaping technological futures. Often encapsulated through the phrase “a person is a person through other persons”, Ubuntu is frequently invoked to highlight ontological interdependency, communal responsibility, relational personhood, and the moral primacy of solidarity and care. It is often positioned as an alternative to individualism, with the potential to complement or “correct” Western liberal frameworks. But what does this invocation actually do? Is Ubuntu being used to transform how we think about ethical challenges in AI, or is the emerging discourse merely softening existing paradigms with a warmer cultural tone?   The emerging pattern A recurring pattern across the literature reveals a limited mode of Ubuntu engagement. It begins with a description of AI-related ethical concerns: dependency, bias, privacy, data coloni...
Post a Comment
Read more

Towards Tech Self-Determination: The case for an African AI Safety Institute - Scott Timcke

As AI foundation models become ubiquitous, the African continent faces a reckoning.  Almost all of the digital technology Africa uses is imported. The anchoring effects of technical codes, standards and specifications act as a kind of shadow regulation that limits how much direct control Africans can have on these systems. Africa cannot afford to be a passive recipient of technologies developed elsewhere, with little consideration for disruptions to local contexts. Instead, a proactive, comprehensive approach to AI safety must emerge, one that is holistic in nature.     A Strategic Imperative for Preserving Self-Determination The traditional approach to tech governance - characterized by reactive regulation (or the lack thereof) - is inadequate. By contrast, an African AI Safety Institute could rise above the narrow confines of technical assessment. Its mandate could extend far beyond simple compliance or risk mitigation to better understanding the ways in which alg...
Post a Comment
Read more